From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: benh@kernel.crashing.org To: "David S. Miller" Cc: , , Subject: Re: GigE Performance Comparison of GMAC and SUNGEM Drivers Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:05:18 +0100 Message-Id: <20011121000518.8434@mailhost.mipsys.com> In-Reply-To: <20011120.115015.10305322.davem@redhat.com> References: <20011120.115015.10305322.davem@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > Well, I think we may get overall better perfs once we have this > fixed, and (David, can you confirm ?), I think jumbo frames can > be supported. > >No, the GEM chips are broken and don't support jumbo frames. Ah, ok, I stand corrected. Is this a bug in the chip or a flaw of the GEM chip design ? I mean, is there a chance that later revs of the chip or eventually the one used by Apple can support it ? Ben. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/