linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Why these crazy timstamps on some ChangeSets ?
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:10:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011127081007.T23210@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111271323540.15554-100000@gra-lx1.iram.es>; from paubert@iram.es on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:41:19PM +0100


It means that someone had screwed up clocks.  There isn't much we can do
about it, we need increasing dates.

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:41:19PM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> 	Hi,
>
> I just noticed that Changeset 1.678 and 1.679 on linuxppc_2_4_devel and
> 1.483 on linuxppc_2_4 have a date of February 23rd 2002.
>
> Quite annoying when browsing, because bk revtool displays all changes
> since these commits on the same date. I strongly suspect that this will
> last for 3 months or so, resulting in several hundred ChangeSets on the
> same day. I use latest stable bk version BTW.
>
> I suspect that there is no simple way of fixing this, bk won't like any
> fiddling with timestamps to make them more realistic. There may be a
> complex way, based on bk undo and reapplying all the patches (changing the
> date, user name and host name on the machine so that all patches get more
> or less the right values, but it does not look easy).
>
> 	Gabriel.
>
>

--
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

      reply	other threads:[~2001-11-27 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-27 12:41 Why these crazy timstamps on some ChangeSets ? Gabriel Paubert
2001-11-27 16:10 ` Larry McVoy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011127081007.T23210@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paubert@iram.es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).