linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Elizabeth Barham <soggytrousers@yahoo.com>
Cc: <debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: "Cache Profiler" ? (was: No cache control on ppc??)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:36:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020113193619.14166@smtp.wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877kqmvfmy.fsf@yahoo.com>


>I recently installed a NewerTech Maxpowr G3 L2-Cache - which is a G3
>on a board that fits into one of the L2's ram banks on my Starmax
>3000/160. I was ecstatic that the bogomips increased by 187%
>(199.47). Recently, though, I heard of someone installing a JoeBoard
>into his StarMax 5000 and his bogomips being around 800. He mentioned
>something about a "Cache Profiler". It seems that BootX is somehow
>able to tell the kernel that there is a G3 in the cache and speed is
>increased greatly.
>
>The CPU on the StarMax 3000/160 motherboard itself (what originally
>came with it) is a PPC 603e. /proc/cpuinfo shows a 750 - which is good
>but the bogomips are nowhere near what this person reported.  I do not
>use BootX for I prefer booting straight into Linux with Quik.  Does
>anyone know anymore about this and if it's possible to increase
>performance more by somehow making the G3 quicker?

First boot once with BootX. Once in linux, grab the value of
/proc/sys/kernel/l2cr. Then, go back to quik, and in your
boot scripts, write back this value. This is the configuration
of the backside L2 cache of the 750.

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-13 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0201121753510.11140-100000@darkwing.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
2002-01-12 21:39 ` No cache control on ppc?? Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-13  5:36   ` Timothy A. Seufert
2002-01-13  6:51     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-13  8:06       ` "Cache Profiler" ? (was: No cache control on ppc??) Elizabeth Barham
2002-01-13 19:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2002-01-15  9:17           ` Elizabeth Barham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020113193619.14166@smtp.wanadoo.fr \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=soggytrousers@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).