From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:28:13 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Momchil Velikov Cc: Kaoru Fukui , hozer@drgw.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Broken asm/div64.h macro Message-ID: <20020128152813.GG19960@opus.bloom.county> References: <200201280141.KAA17879@mail.highway.ne.jp> <87wuy2c2lf.fsf@fadata.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87wuy2c2lf.fsf@fadata.bg> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote: > > >>>>> "Kaoru" == Kaoru Fukui writes: > > Kaoru> On 27 Jan, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > >> Did you actually try compiling PPC this way?? > >> > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x494): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x494): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 > >> __umoddi3 > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x4ac): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x4ac): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 > >> __udivdi3 > > Kaoru> libgcc.a has those libraries. > > Yeah, but we don't link with libgcc.a. (which I forgot). Er, but isn't it (sort-of) considered a bug if the kernel links with libgcc.a ? I think the consensious on l-k would be yes. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/