From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: performance monitor exceptions
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:37:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020211233730.E5079@almesberger.net> (raw)
Hi,
I'm banging my head at a problem with exceptions. What I want to
do is to get the performance monitor to give me exceptions at
roughly 1 kHz, to drive the kernel profiler. The problem is that
my changes usually kill the system within a few minutes :-(
I'm quite new to the PPC, so I'll include a bit more details, in
case I made some trivial mistake. My kernel is 2.4.17, my CPU is a
MPC7410.
First of all, I changed the vector to:
. = 0xf00
b PerformanceMonitor
Then, I added a tiny little handler that does nothing but re-enable
the PE exception. For getting a register, I mimicked EXCEPTION_PROLOG:
PerformanceMonitor:
// 955 is SIAR
mtspr 955,r20
mfspr r20,SPRN_MMCR0
oris r20,r20,MMCR0_PMXE@h
mtspr SPRN_MMCR0,r20
mfspr r20,955
SYNC
RFI
And then I added of course a bit of code to enable all this:
int __init setup_perf_mon(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
local_irq_disable();
/* ca. 3 kHz */
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0,(mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0) & ~MMCR0_TBSEL_MASK) |
MMCR0_PMXE | (MMCR0_TBSEL_TBL15 << MMCR0_TBSEL_SHIFT) | MMCR0_TBEE);
local_irq_restore(flags);
return 0;
}
It seems to work (I had a handler there that does something a little
more useful), but when I start kernel builds, I get a dead system
(rebooted by hardware watchdog) within a few minutes.
Instead of SIAR, I also tried SPRG0 and SPRG1, but got exactly the
same behaviour. Time to crash varies from one to ten minutes. The
time increases proportionally if I use TLB[19] (~200 Hz) instead.
Any ideas of what I could be trampling over (or be trampled over
by) ? This code seems rather bullet-proof to me, and I don't think
anything else is using SIAR, or could change it while I'm using it.
Thanks,
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Lausanne, CH wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://icawww.epfl.ch/almesberger/_____________________________________/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-11 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-11 22:37 Werner Almesberger [this message]
2002-02-12 12:55 ` performance monitor exceptions benh
2002-02-12 18:33 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-02-13 11:14 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-13 12:48 ` benh
2002-02-13 19:01 ` G4 boot crash problems with 2.4 "stable" David A. Gatwood
2002-02-13 19:07 ` benh
2002-02-13 21:09 ` David A. Gatwood
2002-02-13 21:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-02-13 23:48 ` Ethan Benson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020211233730.E5079@almesberger.net \
--to=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).