From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 2.5 development
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:44:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020215104433.C28735@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020215173619.GN2004@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:36:19AM -0700
> These are related trees. For 2.5.x all of the PPC trees are related to
> the official Linus 2.5.x bk tree. Something like:
> linux-2.5 -> {for-linus-*, linuxppc-2.5}.
> Since linuxppc-2.5 and for-linus-ppc are both children of linux-2.5,
> shouldn't they be related?
Yes, if they are all clones from the same original tree, they are all
related. The way to tell is to run "bk identity" in each tree, if that
output is the same, you may pull between them.
I thought Paul was talking about taking changes from the tree Cort created
and putting it the tree Linus created.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-15 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-15 12:11 2.5 development Paul Mackerras
2002-02-15 16:40 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 16:58 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 17:06 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:17 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 17:33 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:36 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 18:44 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-02-15 18:50 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 23:53 ` Larry McVoy
[not found] <p05100300b8a144d7cf05@[66.26.75.241]>
2002-02-26 15:51 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2002-02-26 16:13 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020215104433.C28735@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).