From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:53:52 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Tom Rini Cc: Larry McVoy , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: 2.5 development Message-ID: <20020215155352.H32005@work.bitmover.com> References: <15468.64269.8252.644104@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20020215085812.Z8353@work.bitmover.com> <20020215173210.GM2004@opus.bloom.county> <20020215093350.K8353@work.bitmover.com> <20020215173619.GN2004@opus.bloom.county> <20020215104433.C28735@work.bitmover.com> <20020215185016.GQ2004@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020215185016.GQ2004@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:50:16AM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > So are out of order changesets on the horizon? That depends on the height of the mountain on which you are standing. :-) They are a ways out, you'll need to change your workflow a bit until we get them. Jeff Garzik is going to take a pass at a Documentation/bk-howto this weekend which will describe how he does it. The reports from Linus are that if you are willing to work like Jeff, it does save Linus quite a bit of work. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/