linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dpates@dsdk12.net (Derrik Pates)
To: "marc. h." <heckmann@hbe.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: jdk 1.4?
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:00:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020226160039.GA18735@dsdk12.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020226104929.GA7754@hbe.ca>


On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:30AM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
> noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
> google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
> 2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
> just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
> to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
> fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
> release now as well.

I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)

> Is the blackdown release fast enough for you, or is there something I'm
> missing?

Well, I don't run too much Java stuff, so it's been sort of a non-issue.
I'm sure a JIT for the PPC would speed things up a lot, but the lack of
it hasn't been a real issue for me, for the most part.

--
Derrik Pates      |   Sysadmin, Douglas School   |    #linuxOS on EFnet
dpates@dsdk12.net |     District (dsdk12.net)    |    #linuxOS on OPN

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-25 18:06 jdk 1.4? R Shapiro
2002-02-26  0:22 ` Josh Rosenau
2002-02-26  2:07   ` Michel Dänzer
2002-02-26  2:16   ` Steven Hanley
2002-02-26  4:03     ` Derrik Pates
2002-02-26 10:49       ` marc. h.
2002-02-26 16:00         ` Derrik Pates [this message]
2002-02-26 16:06           ` marc. h.
2002-02-26 16:19             ` Michel Dänzer
2002-02-28 13:11               ` marc. h.
2002-02-28 20:43                 ` Michel Dänzer
2002-03-01  6:26             ` Derrik Pates
2002-03-01 12:48               ` Marc Heckmann
2002-02-26 16:12           ` Ryan Boder
2002-02-28 13:28 ` Kevin B. Hendricks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020226160039.GA18735@dsdk12.net \
    --to=dpates@dsdk12.net \
    --cc=heckmann@hbe.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).