jdk 1.4?

jdk 1.4?

[R Shapiro]

What's the status of jdk1.4 for ppc linux? A project I'm working on is
very eager to switch from 1.3 to 1.4 (all the othe developers are
running intel linux or nt/2000).  Since last Fall I've been running
darwin/osx but it looks like Apple won't have a 1.4 release for quite
some time.  Is ppc linux likely to have a working version soon?

Please cc me directly on any replies.

Thanks -

--
rshapiro@bbn.com


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Josh Rosenau]

So on Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:06:55PM -0500, R Shapiro was all like,

>What's the status of jdk1.4 for ppc linux? A project I'm working on is
>very eager to switch from 1.3 to 1.4 (all the othe developers are
>running intel linux or nt/2000).  Since last Fall I've been running
>darwin/osx but it looks like Apple won't have a 1.4 release for quite
>some time.  Is ppc linux likely to have a working version soon?

Or even a version that works with recent mozilla builds would be sweet.
The lizard wants 1.3.1, and we only seem to have 1.3.0_PL1.  Or am I
missing something?

I'd love to be able to use recent mozilla's with java.

--
Joshua Rosenau                        http://people.ukans.edu/~jrosenau
Dyche Hall/ 1345 Jayhawk Blvd.                           (785) 864-4159
Lawrence, KS 66045-7561                                PGP key 88D2C320
            "My hassle sense is tingling." Sluggy Freelance

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Michel Dänzer]

On Die, 2002-02-26 at 01:22, Josh Rosenau wrote:
>
> So on Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:06:55PM -0500, R Shapiro was all like,
>
> >What's the status of jdk1.4 for ppc linux? A project I'm working on is
> >very eager to switch from 1.3 to 1.4 (all the othe developers are
> >running intel linux or nt/2000).  Since last Fall I've been running
> >darwin/osx but it looks like Apple won't have a 1.4 release for quite
> >some time.  Is ppc linux likely to have a working version soon?
>
> Or even a version that works with recent mozilla builds would be sweet.
> The lizard wants 1.3.1, and we only seem to have 1.3.0_PL1.  Or am I
> missing something?

Yes, the current Blackdown release. :)


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Steven Hanley]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:22:35PM -0600, Josh Rosenau wrote:
>
> So on Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:06:55PM -0500, R Shapiro was all like,
>
> >What's the status of jdk1.4 for ppc linux? A project I'm working on is
> >very eager to switch from 1.3 to 1.4 (all the othe developers are
> >running intel linux or nt/2000).  Since last Fall I've been running
> >darwin/osx but it looks like Apple won't have a 1.4 release for quite
> >some time.  Is ppc linux likely to have a working version soon?
>
> Or even a version that works with recent mozilla builds would be sweet.
> The lizard wants 1.3.1, and we only seem to have 1.3.0_PL1.  Or am I
> missing something?
>
> I'd love to be able to use recent mozilla's with java.

-rw-rw-r--    1 sjh      sjh      21398886 Jan 29 12:49 j2sdk-1.3.1-02a-FCS-linux-ppc.bin

downloaded from a blackdown mirror that was up to date, this was released mid
january or so AFAIR.

        See You
            Steve

--
sjh@wibble.net http://wibble.net/~sjh
You are subtle as a window pane standing in my view
but I will wait for it to rain so that I can see you
   Anticipate - Ani

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Derrik Pates]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:16:42PM +1100, Steven Hanley wrote:
> > I'd love to be able to use recent mozilla's with java.
>
> -rw-rw-r--    1 sjh      sjh      21398886 Jan 29 12:49 j2sdk-1.3.1-02a-FCS-linux-ppc.bin
>
> downloaded from a blackdown mirror that was up to date, this was released mid
> january or so AFAIR.

I've got it also (on an iBook FireWire) and it works great. I just wish
that the Blackdown guys would release PPC debs of it too, instead of
just for i386.

--
Derrik Pates      |   Sysadmin, Douglas School   |    #linuxOS on EFnet
dpates@dsdk12.net |     District (dsdk12.net)    |    #linuxOS on OPN

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[marc. h.]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:03:51PM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:16:42PM +1100, Steven Hanley wrote:
> > > I'd love to be able to use recent mozilla's with java.
> >
> > -rw-rw-r--    1 sjh      sjh      21398886 Jan 29 12:49 j2sdk-1.3.1-02a-FCS-linux-ppc.bin
> >
> > downloaded from a blackdown mirror that was up to date, this was released mid
> > january or so AFAIR.
>
> I've got it also (on an iBook FireWire) and it works great. I just wish
> that the Blackdown guys would release PPC debs of it too, instead of
> just for i386.

lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
release now as well.

Is the blackdown release fast enough for you, or is there something I'm
missing?

Cheers,

-m


--
	C3C5 9226 3C03 CDF7 2EF1  029F 4CAD FBA4 F5ED 68EB
	key: http://people.hbesoftware.com/~heckmann/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Derrik Pates]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:30AM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
> noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
> google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
> 2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
> just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
> to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
> fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
> release now as well.

I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)

> Is the blackdown release fast enough for you, or is there something I'm
> missing?

Well, I don't run too much Java stuff, so it's been sort of a non-issue.
I'm sure a JIT for the PPC would speed things up a lot, but the lack of
it hasn't been a real issue for me, for the most part.

--
Derrik Pates      |   Sysadmin, Douglas School   |    #linuxOS on EFnet
dpates@dsdk12.net |     District (dsdk12.net)    |    #linuxOS on OPN

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[marc. h.]

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:00:39AM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:30AM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> > lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
> > noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
> > google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
> > 2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
> > just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
> > to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
> > fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
> > release now as well.
>
> I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
> it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
> this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
> here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
> Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)

Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
kernel..

you can download from: http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/dklx130/dklx130-p

only annoying thing is that you have to register for a password.

-m

--
	C3C5 9226 3C03 CDF7 2EF1  029F 4CAD FBA4 F5ED 68EB
	key: http://people.hbesoftware.com/~heckmann/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Ryan Boder]

On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 11:00, Derrik Pates wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:30AM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> > lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
> > noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
> > google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
> > 2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
> > just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
> > to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
> > fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
> > release now as well.

I had problems with the IBM java also. It worked great the first time
through (running Limewire) but, after that it would always tell me that
it couldn't allocate the needed memory are exit right away.

So I had to switch back to blackdown. I haven't run any actual tests or
anything, but the IBM one seemed faster (probably because it is JIT
enabled), but atleast the blackdown java works.

Ryan

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Michel Dänzer]

On Die, 2002-02-26 at 17:06, marc. h. wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:00:39AM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:30AM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> > > lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
> > > noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
> > > google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
> > > 2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
> > > just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
> > > to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
> > > fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
> > > release now as well.
> >
> > I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
> > it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
> > this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
> > here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
> > Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)
>
> Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
> not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
> kernel..

Works here, but then I've applied a couple patches:
2.4.18-pre9-benh-o1-xfs-lolat-aa ;)

As you mention sched_yield(), the O(1) scheduler patch could make the
difference?


> you can download from: http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/dklx130/dklx130-p
>
> only annoying thing is that you have to register for a password.

You can get it from the SuSE FTP server without that.


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[marc. h.]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:19:57PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
> > > it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
> > > this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
> > > here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
> > > Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)
> >
> > Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
> > not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
> > kernel..
>
> Works here, but then I've applied a couple patches:
> 2.4.18-pre9-benh-o1-xfs-lolat-aa ;)
>
> As you mention sched_yield(), the O(1) scheduler patch could make the
> difference?

hmm, I tried the O(1) scheduler with your patch and it still doesn't work.

maybe it's lolat? or benh? I'll try that tonight.

but could you do me a favour? can you try out 2.4.18-rc4 vanilla? and confirm
that it doesn't work? that would eliminate the possiblity that it's a userspace
issue (or rather some kind of kernel-userspace interaction problem)

and you're sure your trying the IBM-jdk right? could be that you have the
blackdown JDK installed as well and it comes first in your PATH or something?
just want to make sure.

thanks in advance.

-m

--
	C3C5 9226 3C03 CDF7 2EF1  029F 4CAD FBA4 F5ED 68EB
	key: http://people.hbesoftware.com/~heckmann/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Kevin B. Hendricks]

Hi,

To answer you question.  Don't hold your breath.  I simply don't have
the time to work on it and it has not even been released yet.  Once it
gets released I (or some other volunteer) will try and get a version
working.  Note, we do not have hotspot (yet) and the entire jdk 1.4 no
longer support classic threading, so we have to backport and fix it from
jdk 1.3.x.

This will actually take some time that I simply don't have to give.  If
you would like to join Blackdopwn and help out, that would be greatly
appreciated.

I am simply tired of asking for "volunteers" that never work on things
and never help.

If you or someone you know would really like to help, I would greatly
appreciate it.  Please note, the IBM jdk 1.3.X with JIT is out there and
available from SuSE and from IBM.

Kevin

On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 01:06 PM, R Shapiro wrote:

>
> What's the status of jdk1.4 for ppc linux? A project I'm working on is
> very eager to switch from 1.3 to 1.4 (all the othe developers are
> running intel linux or nt/2000).  Since last Fall I've been running
> darwin/osx but it looks like Apple won't have a 1.4 release for quite
> some time.  Is ppc linux likely to have a working version soon?
>
> Please cc me directly on any replies.
>
> Thanks -
>
> --
> rshapiro@bbn.com
>
>
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Michel Dänzer]

On Don, 2002-02-28 at 14:11, marc. h. wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:19:57PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
> > > > it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
> > > > this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
> > > > here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
> > > > Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)
> > >
> > > Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
> > > not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
> > > kernel..
> >
> > Works here, but then I've applied a couple patches:
> > 2.4.18-pre9-benh-o1-xfs-lolat-aa ;)
> >
> > As you mention sched_yield(), the O(1) scheduler patch could make the
> > difference?
>
> hmm, I tried the O(1) scheduler with your patch and it still doesn't work.
>
> maybe it's lolat? or benh? I'll try that tonight.
>
> but could you do me a favour? can you try out 2.4.18-rc4 vanilla? and confirm
> that it doesn't work? that would eliminate the possiblity that it's a userspace
> issue (or rather some kind of kernel-userspace interaction problem)

Why don't you just try Debian instead? ;)

Seriously, I can't test vanilla because my filesystems are all XFS. :)
And it's not that I have too much time, if you know what I mean... I
hope you understand and that your own testing will give some results.


> and you're sure your trying the IBM-jdk right? could be that you have the
> blackdown JDK installed as well and it comes first in your PATH or something?

I do have the Blackdown 1.1 and 1.3 JDKs installed as well, but I used
the absolute path to the IBM java executable for testing. Coult it still
have picked up some wrong libraries or something?


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Derrik Pates]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:06:16PM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
> not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
> kernel..

I just tried running it on 2.4.18-ben0, with libc6 2.2.5-1 (Debian sid),
and it starts up and seems to run just fine. I did get the binaries from
IBM's site instead of the ones from SuSE's FTP site (the latest bins on
IBM's site are about a month newer). I don't see any JIT in with their
binaries though.

--
Derrik Pates      |   Sysadmin, Douglas School   |    #linuxOS on EFnet
dpates@dsdk12.net |     District (dsdk12.net)    |    #linuxOS on OPN

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: jdk 1.4?

[Marc Heckmann]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:26:59PM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:06:16PM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> > Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
> > not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
> > kernel..
>
> I just tried running it on 2.4.18-ben0, with libc6 2.2.5-1 (Debian sid),
> and it starts up and seems to run just fine. I did get the binaries

ah ha! that's good to hear. I tried with ben0 and no go, so it means it's
a userspace issue on my box. I'll try debian and see what happens.

thanks for your help.

-m

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/