From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 23:26:59 -0700 To: "marc. h." Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: jdk 1.4? Message-ID: <20020301062659.GA12064@dsdk12.net> References: <15482.32063.537466.19280@esb.bbn.com> <20020225182235.D713@ukans.edu> <20020226021641.GC10864@shiva.marian> <20020226040351.GA26767@dsdk12.net> <20020226104929.GA7754@hbe.ca> <20020226160039.GA18735@dsdk12.net> <20020226160614.GA8235@hbe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020226160614.GA8235@hbe.ca> From: dpates@dsdk12.net (Derrik Pates) Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:06:16PM +0100, marc. h. wrote: > Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's > not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh > kernel.. I just tried running it on 2.4.18-ben0, with libc6 2.2.5-1 (Debian sid), and it starts up and seems to run just fine. I did get the binaries from IBM's site instead of the ones from SuSE's FTP site (the latest bins on IBM's site are about a month newer). I don't see any JIT in with their binaries though. -- Derrik Pates | Sysadmin, Douglas School | #linuxOS on EFnet dpates@dsdk12.net | District (dsdk12.net) | #linuxOS on OPN ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/