From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:56:04 -0800 From: andrew may To: Armin Cc: andrew may , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] another for ibm_ocp_enet gzip'd Message-ID: <20020318145604.B6687@ecam.san.rr.com> References: <20020315114137.A26609@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020315200558.GG691@opus.bloom.county> <20020315142542.A27043@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020315223140.GA1643@opus.bloom.county> <20020318142507.A6687@ecam.san.rr.com> <3C95FF7C.7050300@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3C95FF7C.7050300@pacbell.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:53:48PM +0000, Armin wrote: > andrew may wrote: > > > +#Do we want CONFIG_IBM_OCP_MAL_CNT ? > > No Well then you get to update the makefile when we start having more MALs around. > > +ibm_ocp_mal.c: mal.sh > > + $(SH) ./mal.sh 2 >ibm_ocp_mal.c > > + > > > > > And this get applied on top of your first patch? Yes, how else would get mal.sh. There was the first patch, and a second patch that fixed up mal.sh. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/