From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:49:06 -0700
From: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>
To: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>, Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Sokolov <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG>,
	linux-galileo@source.mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: EV-64260-BP & GT64260 bi_recs
Message-ID: <20020322204906.B3363@boardwalk>
References: <20020320181251.C61EF109F3@denx.denx.de> <3C98DB49.2C3A2F79@mvista.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <3C98DB49.2C3A2F79@mvista.com>; from mgreer@mvista.com on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:56:09PM -0500
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:56:09PM -0500, Mark A. Greer wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> > So how do we come to the agreement? By voting? My vote is b),  hoping
> > that the result will be good enough to be accepted for 2.5, too.
>
> Okay, 1 for b).

Somebody notify Eric Raymond!  New method of Linux development:
maintenance by committee!  I bet Paul is happy to have the
responsibility lifted from him.

I think that this is only slightly crazier than giving more than one
person read/write access to the linuxppc trees.

-VAL

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/