From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: , Subject: Re: CONFIG_GENERIC_PPC32 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 00:29:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20020406232941.774@smtp.wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <0204062217.AA17328@ivan.Harhan.ORG> References: <0204062217.AA17328@ivan.Harhan.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: >(This doesn't mean that having such wrapper is the RTTD or that the vmlinux >boot ABI inherently has to change all the time. It is perfectly possible >technically to fix the vmlinux boot ABI, keep it stable, and eliminate all >those wrappers. But that would require a revolution to oust the current >tyrants >with a strangehold on write access to the mainline tree and let people with >more progressive minds in.) heh, well, I for one thinks the PPC tree hasn't a strong enough tyrant ;) >> I don't plan to include Michael boards in it, I want to rework >> our ground to match what Michael does and then let him drop in his new >> boards. > >I don't have my own boards yet. In my tree I used the Adirondack, EV-64260A, >and K2 ports to prove the CONFIG_GENERIC_PPC32 implementation. EV-64260A is >Galileo's reference board for the GT-64260A system controller, and Adirondack >and K2 are SBS boards already supported in 2_4_devel. I'm not at SBS any more >and don't have their hardware, but those boards are still fresh in my head and >I needed a few ports to prove my generic PPC32 implementation. Ok. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/