From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Sokolov <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Incoming to helium.harhan.org:/home/linuxppc/linuxppc_2_4_alt
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:09:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020410150936.GB26754@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0204092005.AA24074@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > And the other point is that this makes it less clean to add in a new
> > board port.
>
> No, it's perfectly clean, you just throw one more machine into the
> CONFIG_GENERIC_PPC32 framework.
You're touching c files. See Pauls comments about that.
> > But what if they aren't really configurable?
>
> They may not be configurable on a given board, but they are configurable given
> an infinite number of boards.
So why not ask it for boards where it's reasonable? IE asking about
8xx enet on 6xx is harmless, but why do it?
> > You could turn off
> > CONFIG_PCI, but I don't think you'd get too far on most[1] systems.
>
[snip]
Yes, and I said most, not all, most. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-10 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200204060739.g367duV18841@helium.Harhan.ORG>
2002-04-08 15:20 ` Incoming to helium.harhan.org:/home/linuxppc/linuxppc_2_4_alt Tom Rini
2002-04-08 17:58 ` benh
2002-04-08 18:57 ` Tom Rini
2002-04-08 18:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-04-09 8:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-09 10:08 ` benh
[not found] ` <0204081705.AA21087@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
2002-04-08 18:02 ` benh
2002-04-09 14:52 ` Tom Rini
2002-04-09 19:23 ` Michael Sokolov
2002-04-09 19:47 ` Tom Rini
2002-04-09 20:05 ` Michael Sokolov
2002-04-09 20:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-10 15:09 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-04-11 3:11 ` Michael Sokolov
2002-04-11 15:29 ` Tom Rini
2002-04-15 16:54 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-04-15 18:11 Michael Sokolov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020410150936.GB26754@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox