From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 08:29:26 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Michael Sokolov Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Incoming to helium.harhan.org:/home/linuxppc/linuxppc_2_4_alt Message-ID: <20020411152926.GD15663@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020410150936.GB26754@opus.bloom.county> <0204110311.AA27153@ivan.Harhan.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <0204110311.AA27153@ivan.Harhan.ORG> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:11:56PM -0700, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > So why not ask it for boards where it's reasonable? > > So you mean replace the "$CONFIG_GENERIC_PPC32" = "y" condition with > "$CONFIG_BOARD_X" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_BOARD_Y" = "y" etc? Fine with me, but I > thought that was ugly code by your standards... :-) Config files are where you're supposed to figure things out, not the C files :) Maybe someday we'll have some automagic bits in the config language where we can specific sections and create all of the config questions on the fly or something, but for now... -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/