From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cort Dougan Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:23:09 -0600 To: LEROY Christophe Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, herve.poli@c-s.fr Subject: Re: What does Montavista Linux gives you in addition to standard Linux ? Message-ID: <20020423132309.J3939@host110.fsmlabs.com> References: <7754BDCF5E4.AAA217C@hermes17.si.c-s.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <7754BDCF5E4.AAA217C@hermes17.si.c-s.fr>; from christophe.leroy@c-s.fr on Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:15:08PM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: There are a number of advantages to using Linux in embedded applications - regardless of what MontaVista has or has not done. They are not embedded Linux, they just use it. Don't judge all of embedded Linux by one company. Do you mean Linux for realtime applications? There are many low-latency style projects to improve standard linux real-time performance along with FSMLabs RTLinux hard-realtime work. There's a lot to choose from no matter what your needs are. } I thought that Montavista had really improved the realtime of Linux, } but i've been told that Montavista has only improved realtime for threads } and for SMP. } It means it is only interesting if you have only one process per CPU, with } a lot of threads inside it. } } Is that right ? } } If it is right, I can't see any interest of using Linux for embedded } systems. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/