From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:54:18 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Stephen Noftall Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Using 2_4_devel to build a kernel for the 8240 Message-ID: <20020425145418.A7189@home.com> References: <200204252126.QAA11192@lists.linuxppc.org> <002401c1eca1$c8260830$61012ac7@snbeast> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <002401c1eca1$c8260830$61012ac7@snbeast>; from stephenn@lcsaudio.com on Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:40:11PM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:40:11PM -0700, Stephen Noftall wrote: > > Hello; > > I am using the latest bitkeeper PPC 2_4_devel kernel, and want to configure it > for the 8240. > > When I run menuconfig, I can see "Sandpoint X3" and "8260" selections, but no > 8240 specific selections. > > What options should I select to enable 8240 support? I am guessing "Sandpoint > X3", is this right? The board is a custom 8240, with Ethernet and SCSI PCI > chipsets, but no serial or ISA components. We have previously gotten a 2.3.16 > kernel to work on it. The Processor Type option text for CONFIG_6xx is wrong. It should say 82xx instead of 8260. Select 6xx/7xx/74xx/8260 for now since you have a "classic PPC" core. Sandpoint is a board. It does not "enable" 8240 support. An 8240 is more or less a 603e + MPC10x bridge for software purposes. Add an entry for your custom board and use mpc10x_common.c like other examples in 2_4_devel. Regards, -- Matt Porter MontaVista Software, Inc. mporter@mvista.com ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/