From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 10:14:32 -0600
To: Robert E Brose II <bob@kunk.jriver.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Holger Bettag <hobold@Informatik.Uni-Bremen.DE>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Dual G3's in Umax S900?
Message-ID: <20020502101432.D26017@host110.fsmlabs.com>
References: <20020502131439.13109@smtp.adsl.oleane.com> <20020502153458.10004.qmail@kunk.jriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20020502153458.10004.qmail@kunk.jriver.com>; from bob@kunk.jriver.com on Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:34:58AM -0500
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


You're good to go with the 604's.  They're sane PPC's.  The 750's were the
only ones that got involved with the no-SMP whackiness.

} I assume then that the 604e has what's needed because IBM has RS6ks with
} multiples of these??

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/