* linuxppc_2_5 vs. linuxppc-2.5
@ 2002-05-13 14:09 Allen Curtis
2002-05-13 15:50 ` benh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Allen Curtis @ 2002-05-13 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Is one of these BitKeeper trees now obsolete? The webpage on
www.penguinppc.org has been partially updated to specify linuxppc-2.5.
(originally linuxppc_2_5)
Thanks
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linuxppc_2_5 vs. linuxppc-2.5
2002-05-13 14:09 linuxppc_2_5 vs. linuxppc-2.5 Allen Curtis
@ 2002-05-13 15:50 ` benh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: benh @ 2002-05-13 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acurtis, linuxppc-dev
>Is one of these BitKeeper trees now obsolete? The webpage on
>www.penguinppc.org has been partially updated to specify linuxppc-2.5.
>(originally linuxppc_2_5)
The _2_5 is obsolete, we keep it around for the history
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-13 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-13 14:09 linuxppc_2_5 vs. linuxppc-2.5 Allen Curtis
2002-05-13 15:50 ` benh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).