From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: benh@kernel.crashing.org
To: <acurtis@onz.com>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: linuxppc_2_5 vs. linuxppc-2.5
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 16:50:33 +0100
Message-Id: <20020513155033.14447@mailhost.mipsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFCEPBDGAA.acurtis@onz.com>
References: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFCEPBDGAA.acurtis@onz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


>Is one of these BitKeeper trees now obsolete? The webpage on
>www.penguinppc.org has been partially updated to specify linuxppc-2.5.
>(originally linuxppc_2_5)

The _2_5 is obsolete, we keep it around for the history

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/