From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 10:27:19 -0700 From: andrew may To: Armin Kuster Cc: Kenneth Johansson , Linuxppc embedded , andrew may Subject: Re: 405 I2C Message-ID: <20020521102719.A20012@ecam.san.rr.com> References: <1021995053.7265.22.camel@swb11> <3CEA70AB.1070405@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3CEA70AB.1070405@mvista.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 09:07:07AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote: > They should both work as modules as it stands, or at least it did in the > past. IMHO is does not matter if it is one or two files. Andrew's > iic_xfer was bundled in with many other changes that did not fly, but I > would revisit is if a new patch where submitted with just the iic_xfer. What changes didn't fly? I only know of the one for the clock divider. I posted it May 7 and heard nothing in the way of comments. I then got no warning that the source was going to be linted and completely invalidate the usefullness of the patch. http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200205/msg00070.html http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200205/msg00060.html ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/