From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 11:43:32 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Rajappa Iyer Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: P2P bridge (DEC 21154) initialization on MCP750 Message-ID: <20020528184332.GK1295@opus.bloom.county> References: <200205250114.g4P1ELi08721@panix1.panix.com> <20020524200953.A21781@home.com> <200205272214.g4RMEOP02787@panix3.panix.com> <20020527164626.A1740@home.com> <200205281835.g4SIZKf09966@panix3.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200205281835.g4SIZKf09966@panix3.panix.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:35:20PM -0400, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > > Matt Porter writes: > > > On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:14:24PM -0400, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > > > > Thanks. This did improve the situation somewhat in that the P2P > > > bridge is now initialized properly, but the devices beyond it are > > > still not probed. Incidentally, I had to work with 2.5.x, since the > > > 2.4 devel kernel was, for some reason, unbearably slow. > > > You're the first person to try one of these boards on 2.5 that I've > > heard of. Can you explain what you mean by "unbearably slow" on > > _devel? Please enable DEBUG in arch/ppc/kernel/pci.c and > > drivers/pci/pci.c and repost those kernel messages. > > Sure, here it is. > > What I mean by unbearably slow is that once init starts running, the > system just slows down to a complete crawl. It takes about 2 minutes > for the login prompt to appear. To run lspci -v took about 10 minutes > (I'm not exaggerating.) Oh, yes. The OpenPIC_InitSenses needs to be updated. Look at arch/ppc/platforms/lopec_setup.c Patches appreciated. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/