From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:21:06 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Stephen Cameron Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper trouble Message-ID: <20020528222106.GC5997@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020528165639.A28325@zuul.cca.cpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020528165639.A28325@zuul.cca.cpqcorp.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:56:39PM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote: > > "bk pull" used to work, (1 week ago) but > now fails for me. > > [scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ bk pull > drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response: > > > Anybody else seeing that? > > [scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ bk version > BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre5 20020330075529 for x86-glibc21-linux > Built by: lm@redhat62.bitmover.com in /usr/build/bk-2.1.x-lm/src > Built on: Sat Mar 30 00:29:33 PST 2002 > [scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ cat BitKeeper/*/parent > http://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel > > Do I need a newer version of bitkeeper? > I didn't see one around. What does 'bk parent' say? If it's not bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing: bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel and then pulling again. I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to be gone. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/