From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:39:47 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Stephen Cameron , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Bitkeeper trouble Message-ID: <20020528223947.GD5997@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020528222106.GC5997@opus.bloom.county> <20020528223319.BCE1011973@denx.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020528223319.BCE1011973@denx.denx.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:33:14AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <20020528222106.GC5997@opus.bloom.county> you wrote: > > > > What does 'bk parent' say? If it's not > > bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing: > > bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel > > and then pulling again. I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to > > be gone. > > Well, from here it looks like a name server problem: > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: ppc.bkserver.net > Address: 10.3.9.222 > > This explains why I get "no route to host" errors... That would do it. I think it's been broken for a while too (sometime between the 24th and the 27th, since the mirror on source.mvista.com stopped on the 24th). Anyone want to ask Larry about it? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/