* Bitkeeper trouble
@ 2002-05-28 21:56 Stephen Cameron
2002-05-28 22:21 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Cameron @ 2002-05-28 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
"bk pull" used to work, (1 week ago) but
now fails for me.
[scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ bk pull
drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
Anybody else seeing that?
[scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ bk version
BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre5 20020330075529 for x86-glibc21-linux
Built by: lm@redhat62.bitmover.com in /usr/build/bk-2.1.x-lm/src
Built on: Sat Mar 30 00:29:33 PST 2002
[scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ cat BitKeeper/*/parent
http://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
Do I need a newer version of bitkeeper?
I didn't see one around.
I am going through an http proxy server
http_proxy=http://proxy.compaq.com:8080/
(Hmm, I wonder if they changed something about
it due to HP-Compaq merger?)
thanks for any hints.
-- steve
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bitkeeper trouble
2002-05-28 21:56 Bitkeeper trouble Stephen Cameron
@ 2002-05-28 22:21 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Roland Dreier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2002-05-28 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Cameron; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:56:39PM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote:
>
> "bk pull" used to work, (1 week ago) but
> now fails for me.
>
> [scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ bk pull
> drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
>
> Anybody else seeing that?
>
> [scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ bk version
> BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre5 20020330075529 for x86-glibc21-linux
> Built by: lm@redhat62.bitmover.com in /usr/build/bk-2.1.x-lm/src
> Built on: Sat Mar 30 00:29:33 PST 2002
> [scameron@zuul lxppc24d]$ cat BitKeeper/*/parent
> http://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
>
> Do I need a newer version of bitkeeper?
> I didn't see one around.
What does 'bk parent' say? If it's not
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing:
bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
and then pulling again. I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to
be gone.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bitkeeper trouble
2002-05-28 22:21 ` Tom Rini
@ 2002-05-28 22:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-05-28 22:39 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Roland Dreier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2002-05-28 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: Stephen Cameron, linuxppc-embedded
In message <20020528222106.GC5997@opus.bloom.county> you wrote:
>
> What does 'bk parent' say? If it's not
> bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing:
> bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
> and then pulling again. I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to
> be gone.
Well, from here it looks like a name server problem:
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: ppc.bkserver.net
Address: 10.3.9.222
This explains why I get "no route to host" errors...
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
The human mind treats a new idea the way the body treats a strange
protein - it rejects it. - P. Medawar
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bitkeeper trouble
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2002-05-28 22:39 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2002-05-28 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Stephen Cameron, linuxppc-embedded
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:33:14AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20020528222106.GC5997@opus.bloom.county> you wrote:
> >
> > What does 'bk parent' say? If it's not
> > bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing:
> > bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
> > and then pulling again. I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to
> > be gone.
>
> Well, from here it looks like a name server problem:
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name: ppc.bkserver.net
> Address: 10.3.9.222
>
> This explains why I get "no route to host" errors...
That would do it. I think it's been broken for a while too (sometime
between the 24th and the 27th, since the mirror on source.mvista.com
stopped on the 24th). Anyone want to ask Larry about it?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bitkeeper trouble
2002-05-28 22:21 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2002-05-28 22:33 ` Roland Dreier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Roland Dreier @ 2002-05-28 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: lm, Stephen Cameron, linuxppc-embedded
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
Tom> I'm not sure why, but ppc.bkserver.net seems to be gone.
Looks like Bitmover messed up the DNS for ppc.bkserver.net:
$ host ppc.bkserver.net
ppc.bkserver.net A 10.3.9.222
R.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: Bitkeeper trouble
@ 2002-05-28 22:37 Cameron, Steve
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cameron, Steve @ 2002-05-28 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:56:39PM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> >
> > "bk pull" used to work, (1 week ago) but
> > now fails for me.
[...]
> What does 'bk parent' say? If it's not
> bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel, try doing:
> bk parent bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
> and then pulling again. I'm not sure why, but
> ppc.bkserver.net seems to
> be gone.
bk parent http://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel
bk pull
works great. Thanks! -- steve
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-28 22:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-28 21:56 Bitkeeper trouble Stephen Cameron
2002-05-28 22:21 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-05-28 22:39 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-28 22:33 ` Roland Dreier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-28 22:37 Cameron, Steve
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).