From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:38:33 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: can/should we use gcc 3.1 to compile kernels Message-ID: <20020607193833.GO14252@opus.bloom.county> References: <200206081337.31359.kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200206081337.31359.kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 01:41:12PM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: > Has anyone successfully used gcc 3.1 or gcc 3.1.1-pre to build actual > working kernels and tested them? > > Does it work? There's at least a few people who've done it. Personally I'll be using 2.95.3 (or 2.95 from CVS) until forced to do otherwise, just because it's the most well-tested compiler. That said, if you do use 3.1, you'll get a bunch more warnings which I don't think you can turn off, which has kind of annoyed some developers. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/