From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@innocent.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:58:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020613205824.GX13541@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020613122317.02e34480@mail.zultys.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:28:29PM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> This is the patch which allows pci_alloc_consistent (and consistent_alloc)
> to be called from an interrupt context.
> It's the required behavior according to Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt.
It looks okay. But I don't see (immediatly) why the change to
pci_alloc_consistent was needed as well. Can you (or Dan Malek, if
you're reading this..) explain?
But aside from that, it looks good and the next step would be to try and
get the generic changes into 2.5 (and the 2.4.20-pre1, 2.4.19 is more or
less frozen, esp for a change like this I suspect).
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-13 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-13 19:28 [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 20:58 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-06-13 21:47 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-13 21:56 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 0:24 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 0:38 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 0:45 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 0:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 5:14 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 14:59 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-15 6:40 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 1:25 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-14 1:33 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 1:57 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-14 2:06 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 2:15 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 3:58 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 4:42 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 2:08 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-14 1:57 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-13 22:23 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 23:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-14 2:17 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-14 2:29 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 23:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-14 2:15 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-14 2:21 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 23:07 ` [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context, part 2 Eugene Surovegin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020613205824.GX13541@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ebs@innocent.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).