From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Cc: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@innocent.com>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:56:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020613215635.GB13541@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D0912F4.4020300@embeddededge.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:47:32PM -0400, Dan Malek wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >..... But I don't see (immediatly) why the change to
> >pci_alloc_consistent was needed as well.
>
> It was a mistake on my part......when CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE is used,
> the consisten_alloc() returns the dma_handle, and we have to ensure we
> don't do the virt_to_bus later to get it (because it will be wrong once
> iopa() is discarded :-)
Ah.. So this part is a correct and necessary fix, separate from the
rest of the patch?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-13 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-13 19:28 [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 20:58 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-13 21:47 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-13 21:56 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-06-14 0:24 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 0:38 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 0:45 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 0:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 5:14 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 14:59 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-15 6:40 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 1:25 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-14 1:33 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 1:57 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-14 2:06 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 2:15 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 3:58 ` David Gibson
2002-06-14 4:42 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-14 2:08 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-14 1:57 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-13 22:23 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 23:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-14 2:17 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-14 2:29 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 23:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-14 2:15 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-14 2:21 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-06-13 23:07 ` [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context, part 2 Eugene Surovegin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020613215635.GB13541@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=ebs@innocent.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).