From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:39:03 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Armin Kuster , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, Paul Mackerras , David Gibson Subject: Re: Trivial cleanup in ocp_uart.c Message-ID: <20020621143903.GO16052@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020620073440.GC20689@zax> <20020620155026.GE16052@opus.bloom.county> <20020621005216.GH20689@zax> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020621005216.GH20689@zax> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:52:16AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 08:50:26AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > And I think it can be used, once it gets registered to the ocp_list (and > > something later accesses it). > > *Nothing* scans the ocp_list (well, except ocp_register() and > ocp_unregister()). This is why I think ocp_register() is a pointless > interface. Yes, but you're also judging an incomplete API. Armin, would things like PM support at least be scanning the ocp_list ? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/