From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: consistent_alloc() revisited
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 17:28:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020720152830.1555@192.168.4.1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020717012442.GA22786@zax>
>As far as I can tell there's no problem with get_free_pages() (or
>rather, alloc_pages()), except that we need to add GFP_ATOMIC to the
>flags if we're in interrupt context.
>
>The problems are in get_vm_area() which does a kmalloc() without
>GFP_ATOMIC and in map_page() which can sleep.
(Note do DaveM: this thread from linuxppc-embedded talks about
out consistent_alloc() functions used to get non-cacheable
DMA consistent memory for peripherials on the various non-PCI
type busses you can find on such embedded CPUs)
We can't rely on in_interrupt(). We can be called with a spinlock
held or on the VM path. In those cases, we need GFP_ATOMIC but
in_interrupt() won't be set.
I would rather pass a gfp_mask argument to consistent_alloc. I know
the pci_xxx version lacks that argument, I yet have to talk to DaveM
about it, in the meantime, it should be implemented as calling
consistent_alloc(..., GFP_ATOMIC).
I want the gfp argument to be passed since some drivers will want
a quite large pool to be allocated at insmod/kernel init time,
and I want to let those drivers to be able to sleep while VM
gets the pages back in this case instead of failing as they would
probably do with a GFP_ATOMIC on a machine that have been running
for some time.
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-20 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-16 2:13 consistent_alloc() revisited David Gibson
2002-07-16 14:09 ` Dan Malek
2002-07-16 14:58 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-16 15:23 ` Matt Porter
2002-07-16 15:27 ` Matt Porter
2002-07-17 1:24 ` David Gibson
2002-07-20 15:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2002-07-21 13:26 ` David Gibson
2002-07-20 15:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-07-21 13:23 ` David Gibson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-16 16:14 Ralph Blach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020720152830.1555@192.168.4.1 \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).