From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Serial core problems on embedded PPC)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:07:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020729190703.GB12964@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020729181352.27999@192.168.4.1>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 08:13:52PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> a. architectures provide a sub-module to 8250.c which contains the
> >> per-port details, rather than a table in serial.h. This would
> >> ideally mean removing serial.h completely. The relevant object
> >> would be linked into 8250.c when 8250.c is built as a module.
> >
> >I think this would work best. On PPC this would allow us to change the
> >mess of include/asm-ppc/serial.h into a slightly cleaner Makefile
> >(especially if we do the automagic <platforms/platform.h> or
> ><asm/platform.h> bit that's been talked about in the past) magic and we
> >could use that object file as well in the bootwrapper as well.
>
> Especially, please, let's avoid once for all statically defined table,
> on PPC (specifically on pmac) the table is really dynamic, and
> the "legacy ports" (if any) may not be ttyS0..1, but could well be
> 2..3, or higher, all this having to be decided at runtime for both
> built-in driver and modular (so eraly_serial_setup isn't good).
Well, on pmac yes. But for a good hunk of the rest of the PPC world the
inital ports are static (and as long as new ports, ie pcmcia stuff, is
handled sanely anyhow, I don't think this is an issue).
> I quite like the sub-module mecanism. I'd rather have it done the
> opposite though. I don't care that much about sharing those files
> with the bootloader, and i'd rather see the core serial code beeing
> a submodule of the arch specific module.
Then how do you propose to keep the bootloader working and kill off the
ugly ugly include/asm-ppc/serial.h ?
> Typically, that would give us:
>
> - 8250_legacy.c would load 8250 core, probe legacy ports and
> instanciate them for typical x86 setup
> - 8250_ppc.c would instanciate known ports on PReP or CHRP machines
> and do nothing on pmac
> - 8250_pci.c would be a pci_driver and instanciate ports for a given
> PCI card
> - 8250_cs.c would be a pcmcia driver and instanciate ports for a
> given PCMCIA modem card
>
> etc... And of course, we can have an arbitrary set of the above loaded
> instanciating ports are they are found.
I _think_ the 8250_cs.c case is seperate in this case. But most of what
you describe would work fine in the arch-is-a-submodule case. What I
was thinking of was some makefile bits to something like:
# The true legacy ports, prep/chrp/others. With a _machine test or
# something.
serial-$(CONFIG_ALL_PPC) += legacy.o
# K2 uses the legacy locations too
serial-$(CONFIG_K2) += legacy.o
# These boards make use of iomem_base/reg shift
serial-$(CONFIG_A) += a_serial.o
serial-$(CONFIG_B) += b_serial.o
...
obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250) += $(serial-y)
Or so. Maybe with a rule to turn $(serial-y) into arch_serial.o or
something.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-29 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-29 4:08 Serial core problems on embedded PPC David Gibson
2002-07-29 9:00 ` Russell King
2002-07-29 14:44 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-29 17:17 ` 3 Serial issues up for discussion (was: Re: Serial core problems on embedded PPC) Russell King
2002-07-29 17:43 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-29 18:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-07-29 19:07 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-07-29 19:09 ` Dan Malek
2002-07-29 19:46 ` Remco Treffkorn
2002-07-29 20:18 ` Russell King
2002-07-30 2:54 ` 3 Serial issues up for discussion David S. Miller
2002-07-29 18:15 ` 3 Serial issues up for discussion (was: Re: Serial core problems on embedded PPC) Matt Porter
2002-07-29 17:47 ` [parisc-linux] " Christoph Plattner
2002-07-29 22:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-07-30 2:51 ` 3 Serial issues up for discussion David S. Miller
2002-08-02 6:01 ` symbol card with orinoco_cs on mpc823 shaowei dai
2002-08-02 6:23 ` David Gibson
2002-08-02 6:36 ` Matthew Locke
2002-08-02 7:01 ` shaowei dai
[not found] ` <3D4AC468.83BCD667@opensource.se>
2002-08-03 1:30 ` shaowei dai
2002-07-30 1:12 ` Serial core problems on embedded PPC David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020729190703.GB12964@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).