From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:19:11 +1000 From: David Gibson To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Restructuring of ibm_ocp_enet driver Message-ID: <20020821071911.GL18818@zax> References: <20020821043627.GF18818@zax> <5.1.0.14.2.20020820231900.03a9e008@pop.prodigy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020820231900.03a9e008@pop.prodigy.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:26:03PM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > > David, > > At 09:36 PM 8/20/2002, you wrote: > >The patch below make some first steps to restructuring the > >ibm_ocp_enet driver . > > Wouldn't it be nice BEFORE another ibm_ocp_enet restructuring to fix bugs > introduced in the previous one? Well, I'm thinking about this in 2.5. There's no way the current OCP setup stuff will go in. > Current version has broken rx ring buffer management and the typo in > requesting IRQ for RXDE event. I noticed the RXDE problem while doing this work. What's the problem with Rx buffer management? > I send bug report and a fix (maybe not the most elegant one) to Armin two > weeks ago. Nothing happened :( -- David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a david@gibson.dropbear.id.au | solution which is simple, neat and | wrong. http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/