From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:37:28 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: acurtis@onz.com Cc: dan@embeddededge.com, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: 8260/8xx IRQ patch Message-ID: <20020828003728.GE22875@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020827173128.20304.h022.c007.wm@mail.directvinternet.com.criticalpath.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020827173128.20304.h022.c007.wm@mail.directvinternet.com.criticalpath.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:31:28PM -0700, acurtis@onz.com wrote: > > Definatly not for 2.4, for 8xx. And did you test this on an 8xx board? > > I do not have an 8xx board but I have tested it on the 8260. On the 8260 if you > loaded a module that wanted to call request_irq() you crashed in a stub function. > No mapping to request_8xxirq() from request_irq(). > > I could make this 8260 specific if you want. Look at the -embedded or -dev archives for a simlar patch that I submitted a few months ago. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/