From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 07:15:11 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Allen Curtis Cc: Brian Kuschak , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: bitkeeper changesets Message-ID: <20020904141511.GK761@opus.bloom.county> References: <20020903213014.5963.qmail@web40201.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:05:30PM -0700, Allen Curtis wrote: > > > I'm using the BK changeset versions for tracking when > > I export specific BK trees into my local > > source-control system. The last one I imported was > > 2.4.19-final (changeset 1.1114 on 08-02-2002). Today > > I did a 'bk pull', and noticed that that changeset > > revision no longer exists in BK! And it seems the one > > I exported previously is now named 1.1091.1.23. > > > > Also, it seems like older versions (earlier than > > 29-May-2002) are no longer available in BK. > > > > Am I missing something here, or did the version > > numbers really change? And why? Should I be using a > > different BK server? > > I see the same thing. It looks like the tag changed to just v2.4.19. The BK > revisions totally changed! Revision numbers are not constant. BK keys are. 'bk help key2rev'. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/