From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 07:57:36 -0700
From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Allen Curtis <acurtis@onz.com>
Cc: Brian Kuschak <bkuschak@yahoo.com>,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: bitkeeper changesets
Message-ID: <20020904145736.GM761@opus.bloom.county>
References: <20020904141511.GK761@opus.bloom.county> <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFCEKIDLAA.acurtis@onz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFCEKIDLAA.acurtis@onz.com>
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:42:41AM -0700, Allen Curtis wrote:
>
> >
> > Revision numbers are not constant.  BK keys are.  'bk help key2rev'.
>
> What about the changed TAG name?

TAG names don't change.  If you can verify that it did indeed change
somehow, it's a bug and you should talk to Larry / BitMover support.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/