linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Rod Boyce <rod_boyce@stratexnet.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: MPC860T FEC problem
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 17:29:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020909152930.0930CFA8B@denx.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:58:50 +1200." <8D7C5F56B409554D9D46AC22195807F3061A2F@exchwenz01.smtp.dmcwave.co.nz>


Dear Rod,

can you please use a standard way to quote text? In this  message  it
is impossible for the reader to decide what was _my_ text, and which
is yours.

In message <8D7C5F56B409554D9D46AC22195807F3061A2F@exchwenz01.smtp.dmcwave.co.nz> you wrote:
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd@denx.de]
> Sent:	Saturday, September 07, 2002 10:15 AM
> To:	o_y
> Cc:	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
> Subject:	Re: MPC860T FEC problem
>
>
> Hi,
>
> in message <MBBBIOFIICDAPDMKHBDEKEDLCAAA.o_yahav@netvision.net.il> you
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to port linux 2.2.14 on MPC860T and busybox as initrd.
>
> 2.2.14 is prehistoric stuff. Don't waste your time on  all  the  bugs
> and problems that have been fixed since.

This was me.

> We are using this kernel and it is working find for us.

But this isn't my text!

> > I have not seen any initializetion of the BCSR4 so i initialize it with
> the
> > value
> > that ppcboot uses , so the ENABLE led is on too.
>
> Ummm... What's BCSR4? If PPCBoot initializes it, why do you  have  to
> initialize it again?

[me]

> Like Wolfgang said why reinvent the wheel

[not me]

> > The device isn't working even when i use ppcboot (i configured ppcboot to
> > use it).
>
> Sic! So get PPCBoot running first.
>
> > 1. Why there is no initializetion of BCSR4 in the original code?
> > 2. If BCSR4 must be initialized , what is the correct value?
> > 3. Is any one have a code that succeeded getting FEC device to work?
>
> Most of this depends on your hardware.  We are using the FEC with this
> kernel version and it is working fine.  Get the 2.2.14 kernel from
> Wolfgang's FTP site if it is still on there the FEC code and lots of other
> goodies work with this kernel version.

[not me]

But the 2.2.14 kernel is still there, unused and  unmaintained  since
November 2000.

> Sometimes you cannot upgrade to a new kernel version this is possibly
> political and not a design decision.  Sometime there is also no reason to
> upgrade to a newer kernel version and have to retest all possible variants
> of device with the new kernel version.

Sure. But there comes a point in time when it just doesn't make sense
to add more new features to old software - especially when  you  find
that  you  spend more effort on fixing old bugs that it would take to
switch to a new version.

Our 2.4.4 kernel is a good example for this problem.

Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as  well
try making it round this time.                        - Mike Dennison

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-09 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-09 14:58 MPC860T FEC problem Rod Boyce
2002-09-09 15:29 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2002-09-09 16:05   ` MCIP805: New Linux Boot William A. Smith
2002-09-09 16:39     ` Wolfgang Denk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-08 20:52 MPC860T FEC problem o_y
2002-09-07 16:59 o_y
2002-09-07 17:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-09-08  7:06 ` Michael Habermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020909152930.0930CFA8B@denx.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=rod_boyce@stratexnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).