From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:01:10 -0700 From: Andrew May To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Cc: amay@viasat.com, akuster@pacbell.net Subject: status of 2_4_devel Message-ID: <20021001200110.GA10094@acmay.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: I have been off doing other stuff so I haven't done a resync of the tree since June. First thing I ran into was a compile problem with the IBM OCP ethernet driver. Have things really not even compiled for the 405GP since Aug 22? This little patch should fix that problem. ==== ibm_ocp_enet.c 1.41 vs edited ===== --- 1.41/drivers/net/ibm_ocp/ibm_ocp_enet.c Mon Sep 30 18:34:10 2002 +++ edited/ibm_ocp_enet.c Mon Sep 30 19:45:24 2002 @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ /* if (tmp_em0isr & EMAC_ISR_MOS ) fep->stats.ZZZ++; */ /* if (tmp_em0isr & EMAC_ISR_MOF ) fep->stats.ZZZ++; */ - ppc405_bl_mac_eth_dump(dev, tmp_em0isr); + ppc405_bl_mac_eth_dump((struct net_device*)dev_instance, tmp_em0isr); out_be32(&emacp->em0isr, tmp_em0isr); } Next I ran into problems with the UART init. Looking at arch/ppc/kernel/ocp_uart.c I was absolutely amazed. Why would you call early_serial_init with values from rs_table when early_serial_init puts the values right back into rs_table? When I had John post the patch to add the call to early_s..., it was to get the base baud rate dynamically from the clock speed, so the value didn't need to be compiled in. As it is now the code in early_uart_init is completely pointless and just wastes space. http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200204/msg00129.html ps: my home email is having problems so I cc'd my work/outlook account. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/