From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:23:14 -0700 From: Andrew May To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference Message-ID: <20021006052314.GG27824@acmay.homeip.net> References: <20020930040143.GF10265@zax> <20021001052121.GV10265@zax> <3D995EC0.2000500@elsoft.ch> <20021002014219.GF1848@zax> <3D9AA452.5070004@elsoft.ch> <20021003011233.GC1102@zax> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021003011233.GC1102@zax> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:12:33AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > Fair enough. I'm just trying to come up with the simplest approach > that still provides the flexibility we need. Based on the evidence > immediately available, what I posted seemed like it. How about you > tell me something about the non-standard PCI mappings, so I can come > up with something better. It would be nice to have the option to let the boot loader set the mapping. I have been happy with getting things done in PPCBoot and ripping out the PCI scanning in the kernel. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/