just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Xavier Grave]

Hi,

I've just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support but when I do a cat
/proc/cpuinfo I can only see one processor ? Do I need to set something more
than SMP=y in make config ?

I'm using a debian kernel source package with the patches for powerpc.

xavier
PS:
[root@ipnnarval ~]# uname -a
Linux ipnnarval 2.4.19 #1 SMP Mon Oct 21 11:51:53 CEST 2002 ppc 0 7455,
altivec supported GNU/Linux
[root@ipnnarval ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
cpu             : 7455, altivec supported
clock           : 999MHz
revision        : 2.1 (pvr 8001 0201)
bogomips        : 999.42

total bogomips  : 999.42
machine         : PowerMac3,6
motherboard     : PowerMac3,6 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
detected as     : 95 (Unknown Keylargo-based)
pmac flags      : 00000000
L2 cache        : 256K unified
memory          : 256MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Kaoru Fukui]

HI!

linuxppc kernel source is
rsync  -avz --delete rsync.penguinppc.org::linux-2.4-benh linux

My binary is

ftp://ppc.linux.or.jp/pub/users/fukui

Kaoru
---------------
My result is

[root@g4mpkfukui root]# uname -a
Linux g4mpkfukui 2.4.20-pre9_B0bsmp #1 SMP Wed Oct 16 16:15:11 JST 2002 ppc unknown
[root@g4mpkfukui root]#  cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
cpu             : 7400, altivec supported
clock           : 450MHz
revision        : 2.9 (pvr 000c 0209)
bogomips        : 894.56

processor       : 1
cpu             : 7400, altivec supported
clock           : 450MHz
revision        : 2.9 (pvr 000c 0209)
bogomips        : 894.56

total bogomips  : 1789.13
machine         : PowerMac3,3
motherboard     : PowerMac3,3 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
detected as     : 65 (PowerMac G4 AGP Graphics)
pmac flags      : 00000004
L2 cache        : 1024K unified
memory          : 256MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld


On 21 Oct, Xavier Grave wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support but when I do a cat
> /proc/cpuinfo I can only see one processor ? Do I need to set something more
> than SMP=y in make config ?
>
> I'm using a debian kernel source package with the patches for powerpc.
>
> xavier
> PS:
> [root@ipnnarval ~]# uname -a
> Linux ipnnarval 2.4.19 #1 SMP Mon Oct 21 11:51:53 CEST 2002 ppc 0 7455,
> altivec supported GNU/Linux
> [root@ipnnarval ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor       : 0
> cpu             : 7455, altivec supported
> clock           : 999MHz
> revision        : 2.1 (pvr 8001 0201)
> bogomips        : 999.42
>
> total bogomips  : 999.42
> machine         : PowerMac3,6
> motherboard     : PowerMac3,6 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
> detected as     : 95 (Unknown Keylargo-based)
> pmac flags      : 00000000
> L2 cache        : 256K unified
> memory          : 256MB
> pmac-generation : NewWorld
>
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>I've just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support but when I do a cat
>/proc/cpuinfo I can only see one processor ? Do I need to set something more
>than SMP=y in make config ?
>
>I'm using a debian kernel source package with the patches for powerpc.

Newer machines need my latest tree for SMP

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Xavier Grave]

On Monday 21 October 2002 19:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >I've just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support but when I do a cat
> >/proc/cpuinfo I can only see one processor ? Do I need to set something
> > more than SMP=y in make config ?
> >
> >I'm using a debian kernel source package with the patches for powerpc.
>
> Newer machines need my latest tree for SMP
>
Ok, I've downloaded it and compiled it, but the only message I get at boot is
loading elf32 image or something like that and nothing more...

I have tried with vmlinux.elf-pmac, zImage.chrp, zImage.chrp-rs6k
with and without SMP.

To compile the kernel I have used a .config based on one from a 2.4.19 which
runs

Any idea ?
Thanks in advance, xavier

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Xavier Grave]

On Tuesday 22 October 2002 13:35, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >Ok, I've downloaded it and compiled it, but the only message I get at boot
> > is loading elf32 image or something like that and nothing more...
> >
> >I have tried with vmlinux.elf-pmac, zImage.chrp, zImage.chrp-rs6k
> >with and without SMP.
> >
> >To compile the kernel I have used a .config based on one from a 2.4.19
> > which runs
>
> If you use linux, just boot a plain vmlinux file, not a zImage.

Work fine now, using vmlinux + the option video=ofonly.

Great to use two processors !

xavier

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>Ok, I've downloaded it and compiled it, but the only message I get at boot is
>loading elf32 image or something like that and nothing more...
>
>I have tried with vmlinux.elf-pmac, zImage.chrp, zImage.chrp-rs6k
>with and without SMP.
>
>To compile the kernel I have used a .config based on one from a 2.4.19 which
>runs

If you use linux, just boot a plain vmlinux file, not a zImage.

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>If you use linux, just boot a plain vmlinux file, not a zImage.

Hrm... I didn't fully wake up yet ;) I meant if you use "yaboot",
not "linux" :)

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Xavier Grave]

On Tuesday 22 October 2002 17:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >Work fine now, using vmlinux + the option video=ofonly.
> >
> >Great to use two processors !
>
> What video card do you have ? It doesn't work without
> video=ofonly ? It's a radeon or nVidia ? Can you
> send me the lspci -vv output (as root)

It's seems to be a RADEON 9000.
No succes with the actual xfree version :-(

[root@ipnnarval ~]# lspci -s 00:10.0 -vv
00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4966
(rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
        Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4966
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Latency: 255 (2000ns min), cache line size 08
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 48
        Region 0: Memory at 98000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
        Region 1: I/O ports at 802400 [disabled] [size=256]
        Region 2: Memory at 90000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
        Expansion ROM at 90020000 [disabled] [size=128K]
        Capabilities: [58] AGP version 2.0
                Status: RQ=47 SBA+ 64bit- FW+ Rate=x1,x2,x4
                Command: RQ=0 SBA+ AGP- 64bit- FW- Rate=<none>
        Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[GRAVE Xavier]

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> >It's seems to be a RADEON 9000.
> >No succes with the actual xfree version :-(
>
> Yah, though XFree CVS should work, and Michel Danzer debs
> might too, but that has to be tested with him.
I'll try them in a few minutes...
> What about radeonfb ? (The kernel framebuffer device). Does
> it work with my kernel ?

It is in the kernel, but how do you now it work ?

I have the two penguin at start.
But I don't know how to make xfree86 to use radeonfb.

xavier

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Xavier Grave]

> >But I don't know how to make xfree86 to use radeonfb.

> Use "fbdev" as the driver in xfree, that will cause X to
> run unaccelerated on top of radeonfb, so it will at least
> be able to set mode & colors properly.
>
> I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
> recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
> so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
> again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.

where can I find the .deb files from Michel, please ?

xavier

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>Work fine now, using vmlinux + the option video=ofonly.
>
>Great to use two processors !

What video card do you have ? It doesn't work without
video=ofonly ? It's a radeon or nVidia ? Can you
send me the lspci -vv output (as root)

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Michel Dänzer]

On Die, 2002-10-22 at 18:31, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >> Yah, though XFree CVS should work, and Michel Danzer debs
> >> might too, but that has to be tested with him.
> >I'll try them in a few minutes...
> >> What about radeonfb ? (The kernel framebuffer device). Does
> >> it work with my kernel ?
> >
> >It is in the kernel, but how do you now it work ?
> >
> >I have the two penguin at start.
>
> Ok, if you have the penguins and the text console, then it
> works.

Not necessarily if you're booting with video=ofonly. cat /proc/fb


> I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
> recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
> so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
> again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.

Yep, and in the meantime, you could try telling the radeon driver to
treat it like a 8500 with the ChipID or Chipset directive.


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Michel Dänzer]

On Die, 2002-10-22 at 17:00, Xavier Grave wrote:
>
> > >But I don't know how to make xfree86 to use radeonfb.
>
> > Use "fbdev" as the driver in xfree, that will cause X to
> > run unaccelerated on top of radeonfb, so it will at least
> > be able to set mode & colors properly.
> >
> > I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
> > recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
> > so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
> > again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.
>
> where can I find the .deb files from Michel, please ?

http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/README.Debian

Beware that the radeon 2D driver is still basically 4.2.0.


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Xavier Grave]

> Not necessarily if you're booting with video=ofonly. cat /proc/fb
[root@ipnnarval ~]# cat /proc/fb
0 OFfb /pci@f0000000/ATY,PheonixParent@10/

> > I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
> > recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
> > so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
> > again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.
>
> Yep, and in the meantime, you could try telling the radeon driver to
> treat it like a 8500 with the ChipID or Chipset directive.
What do I need to put ? There is 4 different RADEON 8500 ?

xavier

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>It's seems to be a RADEON 9000.
>No succes with the actual xfree version :-(

Yah, though XFree CVS should work, and Michel Danzer debs
might too, but that has to be tested with him.

What about radeonfb ? (The kernel framebuffer device). Does
it work with my kernel ?

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>> Yah, though XFree CVS should work, and Michel Danzer debs
>> might too, but that has to be tested with him.
>I'll try them in a few minutes...
>> What about radeonfb ? (The kernel framebuffer device). Does
>> it work with my kernel ?
>
>It is in the kernel, but how do you now it work ?
>
>I have the two penguin at start.

Ok, if you have the penguins and the text console, then it
works.

>But I don't know how to make xfree86 to use radeonfb.

Use "fbdev" as the driver in xfree, that will cause X to
run unaccelerated on top of radeonfb, so it will at least
be able to set mode & colors properly.

I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>> Use "fbdev" as the driver in xfree, that will cause X to
>> run unaccelerated on top of radeonfb, so it will at least
>> be able to set mode & colors properly.
>>
>> I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
>> recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
>> so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
>> again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.
>
>where can I find the .deb files from Michel, please ?

I don't have them at hand, ask him for instructions

Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: just compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with smp support...

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>> Not necessarily if you're booting with video=ofonly. cat /proc/fb
>[root@ipnnarval ~]# cat /proc/fb
>0 OFfb /pci@f0000000/ATY,PheonixParent@10/
>
>> > I think support for the 9000 have been added to XFree CVS
>> > recently, though that may not yet be in the DRI one (and
>> > so Michel snapshots). The XFree CVS is beeing merged
>> > again into the DRI one now, so this should be fixed soon.
>>
>> Yep, and in the meantime, you could try telling the radeon driver to
>> treat it like a 8500 with the ChipID or Chipset directive.
>What do I need to put ? There is 4 different RADEON 8500 ?

Ok, this is offb, so you don't have radeonfb. Another user
is reporting me that radeonfb doesn't work on your card.

I'll see what I can do.

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Try to run X11 with an Apple studio Display 17'' LCD

[Xavier Grave]

Hi,

I have downloaded the CVS tree and compiled it.
The graphic board is a Radeon R250 If [Radeon 9000].
The machine is a bi G4 1Ghz powermac.

If I try a XFree86 -configure I have this error :
(EE) RADEON(0): Cannot read V_BIOS (5)

but It generates a XF86Config.new where the driver name is ati.
If I do a XFree86 -xf86config /root/XF86Config.new the screen remain blank.
And I have only remote session on the machine possible.
If I put radeon instead of ati in the config file and ChipID at 0x514c
(Radeon 8500) I have the same problem but differents error messages.

I join the log message and the XF86Config.new generated by the configuration.

Does anybody have the same configuration ?

Any help welcome :-)

xavier

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/