From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:41:22 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Anders Blomdell Cc: linuxppc embedded Subject: Re: Changes I would like to get into the 2_4_devel Message-ID: <20021026014122.GE30713@opus.bloom.county> References: <86C2D453-E83F-11D6-A4F1-0003931C2BFA@control.lth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <86C2D453-E83F-11D6-A4F1-0003931C2BFA@control.lth.se> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:30:59PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote: > Where do I send a request of the following changes to linuxppc_2_4_devel: > > in arch/ppc/Makefile: > add -D__powerpc__ to CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS (just like it is on kernel.org) > This makes drivers/char/serial.c compile correctly (no more 5 bit > characters) > > in Makefile: > add -D__linux__ to CPPFLAGS > This makes coda.h compile correctly (u_quad_t) As Hollis has pointed out as well, it is very odd that you cannot get a compiler which correctly defines __linux__ and __powerpc__. You are creating a powerpc-linux cross compiler correct, and not powerpc-eabi or some other incantation? > in arch/ppc/kernel/i8259.c: > Some way to set > pci_intack = 0; > if we are running on a MVME 2400/2600, since the PIB (PCI-to-ISA Bridge) > does > not support anything but polling of the 8229 pair. This is an issue since you're running the MVME 2400/2600 under CONFIG_ALL_PPC, yes? Can you verify that in _devel, CONFIG_PPLUS works on these boards, as from what I recall it should. As for fixing CONFIG_ALL_PPC, what I intend to do is add a check to verify the bridge and then set the intack occordingly. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/