From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:00:33 -0700 From: "Tim M. Sanders" To: Tom Rini Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: linuxppc_2_4_devel tree and 2.4.19 Message-ID: <20021029130033.B26986@evilcat.ioinc.tucson.az.us> References: <20021029114712.J25527@evilcat.ioinc.tucson.az.us> <20021029192059.GI688@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021029192059.GI688@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:20:59PM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Thanks, that worked. My misunderstanding. On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:20:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:47:12AM -0700, Tim M. Sanders wrote: > > > > I have the latest linuxppc_2_4_devel tree from > > bk://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel. I wanted to get the 2.4.19 "release" > > out of the tree. I do bk clone -rv2.4.19 linuxppc_2_4_devel linuxppc_2419. I > > know that the directory arch/ppc/platforms is suppose to be part of the 2.4.19 > > tree, but it is not in the cloned tree. What am I doing wrong? > > v2.4.19 is kernel.org, as of 2.4.19, not the tree as of 2.4.19. Do a > 'bk changes', and look at where linuxppc_2_4 of the time was merged into > linuxppc_2_4_devel. > > -- > Tom Rini (TR1265) > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ > -- -- =========================== Tim M. Sanders Synergy Microsystems 520.690.1709 x323 ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/