From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:42:48 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se Cc: mds@paradyne.com, trini@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com Subject: Re: 8xx i2c refers to unspecified chip errata Message-Id: <20021118204248.0a3b6bda.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: References: <3DD939B5.3D1F2B6E@paradyne.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > Patch was(and still is, I think) against linuxppc_2_4_devel. Don't > know your tree, is it not the same as linuxppc? Anyhow, too much time > has passed for me to remember all details and I don't have the time to > go back and do it all over again. I suggest you take the linuxppc > version, patch it and adopt it to your tree. Why the hell are there two different trees? :'( Can't we work all together for a better result? -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/