From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cort Dougan Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:49:31 -0700 To: Tom Rini Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Support for Arctic platform (405LP based) Message-ID: <20021216124931.B9431@duath.fsmlabs.com> References: <20021213043628.GI21319@zax.zax> <20021212215126.V23952@duath.fsmlabs.com> <20021213151808.GI19456@opus.bloom.county> <20021215121526.M30941@duath.fsmlabs.com> <15869.5023.549830.146265@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20021215174120.E30568@duath.fsmlabs.com> <20021216150442.GJ6095@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021216150442.GJ6095@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:04:42AM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: } I'm not sure how that would stop the growth of the '_devel' tree, it } would just split it up into 4xx, and everything else. And my goal of } the new few weeks is to try and move everything that's not 4xx that I } can get my hands on to test into the _2_4 tree. I'm not sure just how } much of that I'll actually be able to do, but I'm going to try. There would be no _devel tree in that case. They'd all be based on Marcelo's so moving back and forth would be easier. There would also be more trees and smaller patches. Right now, if you want an embedded board to boot your only chance is to try the wildly divergent - likely unstable - _devel tree. Having something like this would be much nicer: marcelo ---> linuxppc_2_4 --- linuxppc_2_4_4xx | | | ---> linuxppc_2_4_4xx_walnut | | | ---> linuxppc_2_4_4xx_crazystuff | | | ---> linuxppc_2_4_4xx_some_whacky_port | | | |---> linuxppc_2_4_something ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/