linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Generic RTC driver in 2.4.x
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:35:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301121333.17077.deller@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0301121214440.18673-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 867 bytes --]

On Sunday 12 January 2003 12:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I made some more changes afterwards:
>   - Add forward declaration for gen_rtc_interrupt()

This one should be moved inside the #ifdef CONFIG_GEN_RTC_X section to
avoid "genrtc.c:69: warning: `gen_rtc_interrupt' declared `static' but never defined"
warnings. Please see attached patch.

Or, you could just move the declaration of gen_rtc_interrupt() above the one
from genrtc_troutine(), in which case we wouldn't need the forward declaration at all.

> BTW, perhaps we should move the global RTC_* definitions in <asm/rtc.h> to
> <linux/genrtc.h>, or merge them with the ones in <linux/mc146818rtc.h> and
> move them to <linux/rtc.h>?

IMHO leaving them architecture specific in <asm/rtc.h> seems best to me, and it
leaves the most possibilities to make them later more dependend on the hardware.

Helge


[-- Attachment #2: diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

--- ./genrtc.c.geert	Sun Jan 12 13:16:40 2003
+++ ./genrtc.c	Sun Jan 12 13:15:18 2003
@@ -66,9 +66,6 @@

 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(gen_rtc_wait);

-static void gen_rtc_interrupt(unsigned long arg);
-
-
 /*
  *	Bits in gen_rtc_status.
  */
@@ -99,6 +96,8 @@
 static int stop_rtc_timers;                    /* don't requeue tasks */
 static spinlock_t gen_rtc_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;

+static void gen_rtc_interrupt(unsigned long arg);
+
 /*
  * Routine to poll RTC seconds field for change as often as posible,
  * after first RTC_UIE use timer to reduce polling

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-12 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200301112050.46194.deller@gmx.de>
2003-01-12 11:33 ` Generic RTC driver in 2.4.x Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-01-12 12:35   ` Helge Deller [this message]
2003-01-12 21:49     ` Richard Zidlicky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301121333.17077.deller@gmx.de \
    --to=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).