From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:06:20 -0500 From: Kent Borg To: Jean-Denis Boyer Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Hardcoded Hash_base? Message-ID: <20030313170620.P3222@borg.org> References: <2702075D4DE2B043BF5EB82E9CFAD45B093BD8@mail1.mediatrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <2702075D4DE2B043BF5EB82E9CFAD45B093BD8@mail1.mediatrix.com>; from jdboyer@mediatrix.com on Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:44:50PM -0500 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:44:50PM -0500, Jean-Denis Boyer wrote: > > > In arch/ppc/mm/hashtable.S Hash_base is hardcoded at 0xc0180000, with > > a comment suggesting that that value is "just an example". It seems > > to be colliding with my initrd, so I am thinking I want to move it. > > As the comment says, this code is patched at runtime. > It is done by MMU_init_hw, in arch/ppc/mm/ppc_mmu.c. > The value of Hash_base could be anything, it doesn't matter. I guess it does say that. I my eyes glazed over the several times I tried to understand the comment right before that. Thanks, -kb ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/