linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: set_rtc_time() cleanup / normalization
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:43:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030514154310.GC9430@iram.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16065.31312.163813.582334@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>


On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:05:52AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Denk writes:
>
> > I would like to find out if there is some consensus about the use  of
> > set_rtc_time() in the timer interrupt handler.
>
> The consensus so far seems to be that we shouldn't call set_rtc_time
> in the timer interrupt handler.  Is anyone willing to speak up with a
> reason why we should keep it?  If not, we'll take it out.

Ask on the ntp lists first, I bet you'll upset a lot of people
if you suggest it.

	Gabriel

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-14 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-12 21:17 set_rtc_time() cleanup / normalization Wolfgang Denk
2003-05-13  0:16 ` Dan Malek
2003-05-13  7:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-05-13  8:18   ` Gabriel Paubert
     [not found]     ` <Pine.GSO.4.21.0305131051420.20323-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>
2003-05-13 10:21       ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-05-13 13:35         ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-05-13 12:03     ` Richard Zidlicky
2003-05-13 23:05 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-05-13 23:33   ` Eugene Surovegin
2003-05-14  0:08     ` Wolfgang Denk
     [not found]       ` <5.1.0.14.2.20030513171616.037f6800@mail.ebshome.net>
2003-05-14  3:47         ` Matt Porter
     [not found]         ` <5.1.0.14.2.20030513214040.02a6e6d0@mail.ebshome.net>
     [not found]           ` <3EC1DB1F.8000408@embeddededge.com>
2003-05-14  6:41             ` Eugene Surovegin
2003-05-14  6:47           ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-05-14  8:32     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-05-14 15:57       ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-05-14 16:41       ` Eugene Surovegin
2003-05-14 15:50     ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-05-14 15:43   ` Gabriel Paubert [this message]
2003-05-14 16:28     ` Dan Malek
2003-05-15 18:04       ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-05-15 18:21         ` Wolfgang Denk
     [not found]           ` <20030515184412.GA22327@iram.es>
2003-05-15 19:37             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] <20030514230638.GB1687@linux-m68k.org>
     [not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.21.0305151031410.13683-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>
2003-05-15 10:45   ` Gabriel Paubert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030514154310.GC9430@iram.es \
    --to=paubert@iram.es \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).