From: Chris Zimman <chris@cryptoapps.com>
To: Christophe.LINDHEIMER@fr.thalesgroup.com
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, jjboor@sun023.aimsys.nl
Subject: Re: About MTD.
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:29:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030611152923.GB9573@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D96E2AFA0DF3D211B139009027454948034CBDF7@helios.gnv.tcc.thomson-csf.com>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:45:37PM +0200, Christophe.LINDHEIMER@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
>
> I am trying to use MTD on my board.
>
> I have two flash AMD LV160BB that are configured in 16 bits.
>
> They are in parallel so I have got a 32 bits bus wide.
>
> Each flash is 2 Mo . So the total is 4 Mo.
>
> My flash starts at @ : 0x04000000.
>
> So in the configuration for Linux I set
> CFI : yes
> Start @ : 0x04000000
> Size : 0x00400000
> Bus Width : 4
>
> The result at the boot is :
>
> physmap flash device: 400000 at 4000000
> Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query Table v1.0 at 0x0040
> number of JEDEC chips: 1
> 0: offset=0x0,size=0x8000,blocks=1
> 1: offset=0x8000,size=0x4000,blocks=2
> 2: offset=0x10000,size=0x10000,blocks=1
> 3: offset=0x20000,size=0x20000,blocks=31
> mtd: Giving out device 0 to Physically mapped flash
Can you send along the snippet of code from your config?
> Is it correct ?
> Why is there only one JEDEC Chip detected ?
I'm guessing that the two flash parts are only using 1 chip select for
both. If that's the case, it would make sense to me.
--Chris
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-11 12:45 About MTD Christophe.LINDHEIMER
2003-06-11 15:29 ` Chris Zimman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030611152923.GB9573@dingdong.cryptoapps.com \
--to=chris@cryptoapps.com \
--cc=Christophe.LINDHEIMER@fr.thalesgroup.com \
--cc=jjboor@sun023.aimsys.nl \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).