From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:47:14 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tom Rini Cc: Peter Ryser , akuster@mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, Scott Anderson , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: GPL inconsistency in arch/ppc/ocp/xlinx/ Message-ID: <20030615174714.GA4672@lst.de> References: <20030524201213.GA8256@lst.de> <20030612203205.GA23017@lst.de> <20030612205523.GI828@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit In-Reply-To: <20030612205523.GI828@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:55:23PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > I think you should ask someone responsible first. And on the correct > mailing list as well. Armin is not responsible for this code, Scott > Anderson is. Armin just put it into the linuxppc-2.5 tree. Well, thanks for this explanation, you might aswell have answered when I posted thiß to the linuxppc list the first time. But neither of this is guessable, the only info I had is that Armin commited it.. > Second, > Peter Ryser (who handles the Xilinx side of things) is on the > linuxppc-embedded list, where most of the 4xx people are. Finally, > Peter knows about this, and last I knew was talking to their legal > department. Peter, any news on this? Yeah, I think it's _really_ time we get any update on this. Guys, remember that this renders the linuxppc tree undistributable in strong legaleese so you'd better care. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/