From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:49:45 -0400 From: Kent Borg To: Jean-Denis Boyer Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: ptrace Problem Message-ID: <20030715174945.G12505@borg.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from jdboyer@m5t.com on Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:30:26PM -0400 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:30:26PM -0400, Jean-Denis Boyer wrote: > Which chip is it? An unreleased 603-ish core with other stuff added. > Is it correctly recognized by the kernel > (arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c)? I long ago added an entry to cputable.c, and am using it. I'll look at those specifics again though. Good tip. ...and I just made a change that might help... and that didn't help > This is a silly question, but, did you try to unplug the BDI-2000 > before running gdbserver? Just in case it stops on some exceptions... If I understood correctly: use Abatron to download my code, make sure things are running, them pull that power, and things still run. Attempt to do gdb/gdbserver and it malfunctions in the same way--or at least I think so, I don't have an Abatron hooked up. > Do you use a somewhat recent version of glibc, and was it built > against a somewhat recent version of kernel? Can you also tell us > the version of binutils and gcc ? Not all the combinations are > reliable ;-) Looking at likely source tarballs we have sitting around it seems very likely that binutils were built from 2.13.2.1, and glibc 2.3.2. (How can I be sure?) gcc reports 3.2.2. Are those a compatible set? Thanks, -kb ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/