* 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt"
@ 2003-09-19 22:58 Cliff White
2003-09-20 12:23 ` Michel Dänzer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cliff White @ 2003-09-19 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
System is an iBook2,
distro is Debian unstable
kernel is 2.6.0-test5 or current from
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5
gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
When compiling modules, i get this warning, repeatedly:
CC [M] sound/ppc/pmac.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:3: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .plt
Then, this failure:
AS arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o
arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S: Assembler messages:
arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:220: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes
for .relocate_code
arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:281: FATAL: Can't write
arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
make[2]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common/] Error 2
Suggestions appreciated, please cc me as i am not subscribed to this list.
cliffw
cliffw@osdl.org
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt"
2003-09-19 22:58 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt" Cliff White
@ 2003-09-20 12:23 ` Michel Dänzer
2003-09-22 16:45 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2003-09-20 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cliff White; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:58, Cliff White wrote:
> System is an iBook2,
> distro is Debian unstable
> kernel is 2.6.0-test5 or current from
> bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5
>
> gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
>
> When compiling modules, i get this warning, repeatedly:
> CC [M] sound/ppc/pmac.o
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:3: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .plt
>
> Then, this failure:
>
> AS arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o
> arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:220: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes
> for .relocate_code
> arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:281: FATAL: Can't write
> arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> make[2]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common/] Error 2
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211668 .
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt"
2003-09-20 12:23 ` Michel Dänzer
@ 2003-09-22 16:45 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-22 16:54 ` Bug#211668: " James Troup
2003-09-22 17:56 ` Cliff White
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2003-09-22 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michel D?nzer; +Cc: Cliff White, linuxppc-dev, 211668
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:58, Cliff White wrote:
> > System is an iBook2,
> > distro is Debian unstable
> > kernel is 2.6.0-test5 or current from
> > bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5
> >
> > gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
> >
> > When compiling modules, i get this warning, repeatedly:
> > CC [M] sound/ppc/pmac.o
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:3: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .plt
> >
> > Then, this failure:
> >
> > AS arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o
> > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:220: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes
> > for .relocate_code
> > arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:281: FATAL: Can't write
> > arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> > make[2]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common/] Error 2
>
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211668 .
I followed up on this to lkml/kernelnewbies, and then saw this so (and
the bug# is cc'ed as well). I suspect the problem is that binutils is
no longer happy with:
.section "foo","attrs"
... asm ...
.previous
\n
\n
EOF
(and possibly just .previous\nEOF)
But I don't think the .previous is needed anyhow, so if someone could
verify that the following works (vs 2.6 current, but also a problem in
2.4)
===== arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S 1.6 vs edited =====
--- 1.6/arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S Thu Aug 21 10:17:00 2003
+++ edited/arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S Mon Sep 22 09:21:37 2003
@@ -277,6 +277,3 @@
addi r3,r3,L1_CACHE_BYTES /* Next line, please */
bdnz 00b
10: blr
-
- .previous
-
I'll check this into the kernel.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug#211668: 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt"
2003-09-22 16:45 ` Tom Rini
@ 2003-09-22 16:54 ` James Troup
2003-09-22 17:56 ` Cliff White
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Troup @ 2003-09-22 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: 211668, Michel D?nzer, Cliff White, linuxppc-dev
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> But I don't think the .previous is needed anyhow, so if someone
> could verify that the following works (vs 2.6 current, but also a
> problem in 2.4)
It doesn't; but please see Alan's response[1]. I'm compiling a new
binutils with this patch ATM...
--
James
[1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-09/msg00381.html
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt"
2003-09-22 16:45 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-22 16:54 ` Bug#211668: " James Troup
@ 2003-09-22 17:56 ` Cliff White
2003-09-22 18:05 ` Tom Rini
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cliff White @ 2003-09-22 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: Michel D?nzer, linuxppc-dev, 211668
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:58, Cliff White wrote:
> > > System is an iBook2,
> > > distro is Debian unstable
> > > kernel is 2.6.0-test5 or current from
> > > bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5
> > >
> > > gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
> > >
> > > When compiling modules, i get this warning, repeatedly:
> > > CC [M] sound/ppc/pmac.o
> > > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > > {standard input}:3: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .plt
> > >
> > > Then, this failure:
> > >
> > > AS arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o
> > > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S: Assembler messages:
> > > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:220: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes
> > > for .relocate_code
> > > arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> > > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:281: FATAL: Can't write
> > > arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> > > make[2]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] Error 1
> > > make[1]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common/] Error 2
> >
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211668 .
>
> I followed up on this to lkml/kernelnewbies, and then saw this so (and
> the bug# is cc'ed as well). I suspect the problem is that binutils is
> no longer happy with:
> .section "foo","attrs"
> ... asm ...
> .previous
> \n
> \n
> EOF
> (and possibly just .previous\nEOF)
>
> But I don't think the .previous is needed anyhow, so if someone could
> verify that the following works (vs 2.6 current, but also a problem in
> 2.4)
>
> ===== arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S 1.6 vs edited =====
> --- 1.6/arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S Thu Aug 21 10:17:00 2003
> +++ edited/arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S Mon Sep 22 09:21:37 2003
> @@ -277,6 +277,3 @@
> addi r3,r3,L1_CACHE_BYTES /* Next line, please */
> bdnz 00b
> 10: blr
> -
> - .previous
> -
>
> I'll check this into the kernel.
I rebuilt binutils from source and was able to create a bootable kernel,
I will try this patch
cliffw
>
> --
> Tom Rini
> http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt"
2003-09-22 17:56 ` Cliff White
@ 2003-09-22 18:05 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2003-09-22 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cliff White; +Cc: Michel D?nzer, linuxppc-dev, 211668
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:56:30AM -0700, Cliff White wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 00:58, Cliff White wrote:
> > > > System is an iBook2,
> > > > distro is Debian unstable
> > > > kernel is 2.6.0-test5 or current from
> > > > bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5
> > > >
> > > > gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
> > > >
> > > > When compiling modules, i get this warning, repeatedly:
> > > > CC [M] sound/ppc/pmac.o
> > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > > > {standard input}:3: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .plt
> > > >
> > > > Then, this failure:
> > > >
> > > > AS arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o
> > > > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S: Assembler messages:
> > > > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:220: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes
> > > > for .relocate_code
> > > > arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> > > > arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S:281: FATAL: Can't write
> > > > arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o: File truncated
> > > > make[2]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common//util.o] Error 1
> > > > make[1]: *** [arch/ppc/boot/common/] Error 2
> > >
> > > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211668 .
> >
> > I followed up on this to lkml/kernelnewbies, and then saw this so (and
> > the bug# is cc'ed as well). I suspect the problem is that binutils is
> > no longer happy with:
> > .section "foo","attrs"
> > ... asm ...
> > .previous
> > \n
> > \n
> > EOF
> > (and possibly just .previous\nEOF)
> >
> > But I don't think the .previous is needed anyhow, so if someone could
> > verify that the following works (vs 2.6 current, but also a problem in
> > 2.4)
> >
> > ===== arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S 1.6 vs edited =====
> > --- 1.6/arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S Thu Aug 21 10:17:00 2003
> > +++ edited/arch/ppc/boot/common/util.S Mon Sep 22 09:21:37 2003
> > @@ -277,6 +277,3 @@
> > addi r3,r3,L1_CACHE_BYTES /* Next line, please */
> > bdnz 00b
> > 10: blr
> > -
> > - .previous
> > -
> >
> > I'll check this into the kernel.
>
> I rebuilt binutils from source and was able to create a bootable kernel,
> I will try this patch
Don't bother, as has been pointed out it was a binutils bug. If it
ain't broke, don't fix it :)
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-22 18:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-19 22:58 2.6.0-test5 "incorrect section attributes for .plt" Cliff White
2003-09-20 12:23 ` Michel Dänzer
2003-09-22 16:45 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-22 16:54 ` Bug#211668: " James Troup
2003-09-22 17:56 ` Cliff White
2003-09-22 18:05 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).